My view explores the intersection of behavioral economics and the rapid evolution of modern industry. Lok argues that the trajectory of technological progress is not governed solely by engineering capabilities or the cold logic of market efficiency. Instead, he posits that the success or failure of new technologies is deeply rooted in human psychology, cognitive biases, and social dynamics.[
In conclusion, my behavioral economics view, applied to 21st-century new technology development, would emphasize that technological progress is not merely a function of engineering prowess or market efficiency. Instead, it is deeply intertwined with human psychology, cognitive biases, social dynamics, and emotional responses .
Sorry we are currently not available in your region. Alternatively you can purchase from our partners
Write your review for this book (optional)
Review Deleted
Your review has been deleted and won’t appear on the book anymore.Sorry we are currently not available in your region. Alternatively you can purchase from our partners
John Lok
JOHN LOK, Behavioral Economist
I had graduated business Administration Science Degree in Common Wealth Open University.
My view emphasizes several key psychological factors that influence the tech industry:
Loss Aversion: Consumers are often more motivated to avoid the "loss" of a current convenience than they are to gain a new technological benefit. This explains the "status quo bias" where superior technologies fail to gain traction because users are comfortable with existing systems.
Overconfidence Bias: My view notes that entrepreneurs and innovators often suffer from overconfidence, leading to the over-investment in technologies that the market is not yet ready to absorb.
Social Proof: The adoption of new gadgets or software is frequently driven by social dynamics rather than utility. If a technology is perceived as a status symbol or is adopted by a "tribe," its market value increases exponentially regardless of its technical specifications.
Robotics and the Future of Labor
A significant portion of my analysis is dedicated to the role of robotics in both developing and developed nations. He raises critical questions regarding whether robots will serve as tools for human liberation or as catalysts for economic displacement.
Improving Social Development
My view suggests that for developing countries, the application of robotics can bridge the gap in infrastructure and healthcare. By automating repetitive or dangerous tasks, these nations can accelerate their social development. However, he warns that this must be balanced with the psychological impact on the workforce. If workers feel threatened by automation, the resulting "technostress" can lead to social instability.
